Wednesday, October 8, 2014

That’s All You Get

Hi Friends,

This is Momma X. Daddy is in the hospital with some chest pains. They’re not sure what the deal is so they are keeping him overnight. He asked me to post the below for your blog even though he hasn’t had a chance to really proof and refine it. I think it’s great. Hope you will enjoy and hope Daddy can be in touch with you all soon.

---
 by Daddy X

One thing I miss at OGG is the quarterly “What I’ve Been Reading” topic we used to address. It offered a free ride every three months so I didn’t have to reveal how clueless I am regarding this craft we pursue. My status as dilettante is once again exposed—a hobbyist—a common trickster hidden among the real McCoy.

So here are a couple of books I’ve read recently, and my take on the first person pov in each:

     
Night Film
by Marisha Pessl

A tricky book. I’m not spoiling anything by telling you that it’s a story of an apparent suicide: The talented daughter of an enigmatic, reclusive horror film director (one Stanislaw Cordova) is found dead from a fall in an abandoned building on the wrong side of town. The narrator searches for truth in the matter, escorting the reader through the machinations and minds of pro and anti-Cordovites, opposing forces who put him either on the highest intellectual pedestal or who saw him personifying evil at its worst. The director’s unconventional filming methods are hinted at, allowing the reader’s imagination to take flight through red herrings, dead ends, dark, intriguing characters and situations.

Well worth the read, considering that Pessl’s inventive repertoire of devices could soon become commonplace in literature.

The female author adopts the first person past pov, which holds up well, both in delivery and in convincing me that it was actually a man narrating the story. Unfortunately, her use of italics is distracting. When I first saw how many words were leaning over, I thought it was another successful device among several in the book, but it did get annoying with such a plethora down the road.

Not so in the next book I started, the first novel by Donna Tartt, Pulitzer-prize winning author of The Goldfinch.

A Secret History

A masterwork, wholeheartedly recommended, but IMO, not quite perfection due to pov issues. Although the delivery was convincing, the gender of the male narrator was not, at least not until about the middle of the book. Perhaps this is personal on my part: The language is that of an earlier time, maybe late 19th century to the middle of the last, when we had the likes of Anais Nin and Lawrence Durell in the mix. Flowery, verbose, intricate language—used by a social class completely unfamiliar to me. Not what I usually equate with a modern masculine voice. The book is gripping, with good detail and a sense of intrigue to die for. Her longer sentences are well thought-out examples of sentence construction. If only she’d made the narrator with an innie instead of an outie.



All this brings to mind the ultimate pov/tense shifter: JP Donleavy. It’s generally acknowledged that the best practitioners can get away with anything. Donleavy is a perfect example, a writer who can and does flout the rules successfully:

He finishes about a quarter of his sentences. He jumps pov, sometimes within one paragraph, encompassing several tenses. With each of his characters, he takes us through first person present internal monologue. Donleavy’s heroes are often preposterous assholes, horrible breeds we wind up loving on some level of ironic compassion.

How does he do it? With a style unique to himself.

Even though completely different, the Tartt book shows a few general characteristics of a Donleavy work: The players occupy the highest economic levels of society—people with too much money or status for their own good. A job is something other people do. In fact one of Tartt’s characters, Bunny, is reminiscent of Donleavy’s Beefy, featured in “The Beastly Beatitudes of Balthazar B.” Tartt’s book is set on a college campus, evoking  some of Donleavy’s atmospherics.

Donleavy’s most well-known work is “The Ginger Man”. Written back in the 60’s.  He should be required reading for convention-breakers. ;>)

Here’s hoping I’ve managed to skate by on this topic that I can’t articulate as well as others here have done so eloquently. All a guy can do is try.

“Use what you got, because that’s all you get.”
Clarence “Pine Top” Smith.



Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Whose POV rocks your boat?

Leave me a comment. I'm giving away a copy of Downstroke.

There is a constant discussion both by authors and readers as to whose POV a book should be written from and in whose voice? Do you want to be in the heroine’s head? The hero’s. Maybe even the villain’s? As a reader I really prefer third person, and I like scenes from all three POVs. I find first person often hard to follow and most of the time less enjoyable. So why, then, when I wrote Downstroke, my 100th release, did I choose to alternate between first person and third? Because for the first time as an author, that’s the way the story grew in my brain.
I had an irresistible impulse to tell Charley Roper’s passages in the story from her POV, to get the full impact of the emotions she was feeling. I tried it in third person and it just seemed too distant. Twice I wrote the first chapter and twice I deleted it. It just didn’t work for me.
On the other hand, for my hero, Dallas Creed, I needed to tell his POV in third person. Why? Because there were things about his actions and events that happened to him that would have lost their impact in third person. So Downstroke turned out to be the only book I ever wrote, not only with a first person POV but with both first and third person. Below are a couple of passages from the book. Let me know what you think.

Blurb:

It’s been twenty years since Charley Roper and Dallas Creed parted with great bitterness. In that time she’s made a career for herself with the FBI and private security and he’s been a country rock music icon…tumbled to the bottom and risen again. Now someone’s trying to kill him and Morgan Creed wants Charley to protect his brother and find out who’s after him. When they meet again after all this time it’s obvious the chemistry is still there, stronger than ever. They’re older but are they wiser? Caught up in the bitter wash of memories and the tension of a killer in stalking mode, Charley and Dallas begin a roller coaster ride that is emotional erotic and suspenseful.  Is their love strong enough after twenty years to pull them back together?

From Charley’s POV:
I stood in the back of the Baker Amphitheater, leaning against the brick half-wall that separated the seats under the roof from those on the lawn, wondering for the hundredth time what the hell I was doing here. It wasn’t that I’d never been to a concert before. I’d been to plenty, running security detail for high-profile musicians. But I’d never been to a Dallas Creed concert. A deliberate choice, one I’d stuck to until tonight. Morgan Creed, Dallas’ brother, had given me a ticket to the performance with a seat right down front, but I didn’t want to be that close to the man yet. Or give him a chance to see me.
When Dallas Creed and I destroyed our relationship twenty years ago, I stumbled away from it with my heart bleeding and swore never to lay eyes on him again. I had loved him with an intensity that consumed me and I’d been so sure he felt the same way. Then he dropped his bombshell, leaving me emotionally wiped out, with a bitter outlook on love and a determination never to be hurt again.
All these years I’d managed to hide behind an invisible wall, refusing to buy any Dallas Creed albums, as if by ignoring his music I could ignore the man. But his songs were played everywhere and television covered him like green on grass, so avoiding him completely had been next to impossible. It bothered me after a while to discover I actually liked listening to him. Despite that, I was definitely finished with the man. Over and done. Finis.
When he’d had his disastrous accident I hadn’t even called to find out how he was, afraid to open old wounds and let my heart bleed all over the place again. The man was just plain poison to me. Or maybe we’d poisoned each other. I didn’t know anymore; only knew that I’d survived by keeping my distance all these years. We’d been too obsessed with our own careers to care enough about each other to compromise. The blame was certainly not all his. In that secret place that I’d deliberately hidden away, I knew that. I was equally as guilty as him. It just made it easier for me to lay everything at his door.
Yet here I stood, waiting for the show to begin. I wondered not for the first time what had driven him to the excess of drugs and booze that led to the accident, and why he was so determined to put himself through the agony of the climb back to the top.

Dallas’s POV Third Person:
Morgan opened the door a crack and nodded his head.
Jesus, Dallas thought, not bad news. Please. Not when his life was finally turning around.
Then he remembered—and he felt as if a huge spotlight was suddenly focused on his ruined leg. How had he forgotten she was coming? His stomach cramped and he wanted a place to hide. But Morgan stepped back, opening the door wider, and Dallas was frozen in place, watching his past walk into the room.
He wasn’t prepared for her effect on him. Privately he’d followed her career—the years at the FBI, then a long stint with the Hillcroft Group, and finally opening her own agency, Roper Protective Services In all these years they hadn’t spoken or seen each other, but the moment she stepped into the room his body reacted. His cock stiffened, his mouth went dry and his balls tingled as he experienced the familiar impact her body always had on him.
Great.
He shifted in his chair, making sure his dark t-shirt covered the growing bulge behind his fly.
He’d dreamed about this moment, fantasized about it. With every new hit tune, every sold-out concert appearance, he wanted her there so he could show her what she’d missed. Wanted to make her eat her words. Wanted her to see the success he’d become. The success they could have shared.
The accident had changed all that. Made him take a good hard look at his life, at what he wanted and where he’d been going. With death flirting with him, he’d finally had to admit to himself everything was hollow without her. Years ago he’d tried to make a point with her but who had he proven it to? Certainly not himself.
He studied her as she moved fluidly into the trailer and stood to the side, next to Morgan.
Charley Roper had aged much better than he had. Her body was still slim although rounded in all the appropriate places, but now it was highly toned. Jeans hugged her legs and the soft material of her blouse draped over high breasts. Her rich, thick brown hair was still the same rich sable color pulled back into a no-nonsense ponytail. Her face certainly didn’t show the wear that his did, but her clear blue eyes reflected a bitter wisdom that bothered him. And she still gave off the same go-to-hell attitude with her walk and the way she stood almost defiantly in front of him, hands stuffed into the front pockets of her jeans.
Her familiar scent teased at his nostrils, giving rise to a wealth of memories. He remembered how that body felt beneath his, all soft and pliant. How those full lips felt on his mouth or wrapped around his cock.
His hands curled as he fought the urge to reach out and touch her. After all these years she still had the power to steal his breath. He knew if the two of them were alone in this room he’d have her naked and under him in seconds. His muscles tightened, his cock hardened even more and he was back to that last defining night.

Come check me out at www.desireeholt.com
Follow me on twitter @desireeholt and on Facebook desiree01holt


Monday, October 6, 2014

The Voices in My Head

Sacchi Green

Point of View was a topic I suggested, back when we were brainstorming on new themes for our discussions. At the time I was thinking of exactly what’s been so well defined and illustrated by all the previous posters, and what any beginning writers need to learn; is a story written in first person, second person (if that can ever be pinned down,) third person, or the once-ubiquitous omniscient point of view? And what about the “fourth wall,” a term used more in theater when an actor dispenses with the convention that the stage has four walls, and addresses the audience directly? That’s been done in written literature since well before Jane Eyre said, “Reader, I married him.” There’s still more to be said on this subject, but a different interpretation of point of view has been niggling at my mind, so I’m going to veer off a on a tangent.

Point of view is sometimes discussed in terms of “voice.” Is the story being told in the voice of the “I” who lives it (and can’t tell us anything that “I” doesn’t know or observe?) But there are other definitions and functions of voice. [Hang on a minute while I check the topic calendar—okay, we’re not scheduled to discuss “voice” as such any time soon.] What I’ve been pondering lately is how we write in the voices of characters who are very different from ourselves, or at least the selves we recognize as our own. How do we manage to write convincingly from the point of view of another person? How about someone whose vocabulary is likely to be more (or less) limited than ours? Or someone whose frame of reference would be very different? And do our characters speak distinctively enough that a reader knows who’s saying what without needing to be told? These are things I notice when I’m editing other people’s work. All of my fellow writers on this blog manage these things beautifully, often even brilliantly, but I struggle with them myself.

Writing from different perspectives is sometimes a matter of deliberate research into the times and cultures and patterns of speech of the characters we try to depict. More often, I think, we draw on a nearly-subconscious well of information and perceptions that have accumulated throughout our lives. Maybe it’s comparable to having an ear for music. These perceptions are not necessarily accurate, though, and we run the risk of getting it wrong in ways that are only too recognizable to readers who know better. There are characters lurking in the corners of my mind, voices in my head, that I want to write about, but I don’t feel able—don’t feel the right—to speak from their points of view. Occasionally I try anyway, with trepidation, and nobody has called me on my failings. Yet.

Here, in any case, are a couple of examples (you knew that was coming, didn’t you?) of what I mean, from stories I apparently got away with even though they didn’t come out the way I had in mind. This first one was in a book that sold so poorly chances are no one who would raise the subject of the “magic negro” cliché ever saw it. In “Ten Thousand Miles” (from Shades of Blue and Gray: Civil War Ghost Stories) a young, newly widowed Union surgeon in a field hospital along the Mississipi talks with the elderly black orderly who knows more than the surgeon will ever understand.

[EDIT--I realized in the wee small hours of the morning, staying over at my Dad's wi-fi-less house to take him to an early doctor appointment, that this whole first example goes farther off on a tangent than I meant it to. The character I had trepidations about isn't the point of view person at all, but  another very central figure, so it wasn't a matter of point-of-view, but to some extent of this character's voice.]
____________________________________

Ned came to the corner where Jem knelt inside beside a cot. What was it about the man? The patient, a black soldier chest-shot in a skirmish yesterday, clutched at Jem’s hand, eyes shut, breathing so labored Ned could hear it above the orderly’s low song. Gradually the breathing evened out. Now Ned could make out a few of Jem’s words, lullaby phrases that fit the tune, sung in a voice that rose and fell in a range like—that ought to be—surely it must be a woman’s! A mellow contralto, not the high sweet purity of Lyddie’s voice, but just as unmistakable.
In a surge of memory, part of the puzzle slid into place. Jem knew it, too, raising his head as his song drifted unhurriedly to a close, looking right through the mosquito netting and the darkness outside into Ned’s eyes. With no sign at all of disturbance, he withdrew his hand from the now-slack one, stood slowly, parted the netting at its closest joining, and came to stand beside the surgeon.
The only thing Ned thought of to say was, “Is he…?” with a tilt of his head toward the figure on the cot.
“Not yet. Just peacably asleep. But he won’t ever wake up.”
Ned nodded, unsurprised. He’d known there was no better hope. “And young Nelson over there?”
“Fever’s got him worse ‘n before. He may last the night, but not much longer.”
This, too, was expected. And unavoidable.
They walked together in the darkness between the tent and the thorn hedge. “Jem, were you ever in Indiana?”
“Cap’n, I been everywhere.” Jem’s rich chuckle revealed more than he generally allowed anyone to hear. “South, east, west, and north up along the Wabash and all the way to Canada. Knew your Quaker Grandpa, but you were maybe sixteen then, young Neddie Blayne, always off roamin’ the woods and swamps with that neighbor girl.” His slantwise glance was a question. “That sweet, solemn child with the shy, quicksilver smile…”
“Yes.” Ned drew a deep breath and walked on a bit. “You were well known as a midwife, I recall.” No use even speculating if a skilled midwife could have saved Lyddie, or the child. Or if he himself, off at the wrong time for a week of medical lectures, could have done anything to help.
“Midwife, nurse, healer one way or another. Worked in Canada, Chicago, other places, sometimes in hospitals. The north is mighty like the south when it comes to white folks who won’t touch black folks even when they need doctorin’. Worse, in fact. There’s always work for me. If it means I play a man’s part here, at my age that don’t much signify.”
Ned supposed it didn’t. Easiest to keep on thinking of Jem as a man.
“And then you came back here.”
Jem sat down on a crate of medical supplies. Ned did the same.
“Soon’s I heard they were raising African Brigade troops in these parts I knew where I belonged. With all the folks I helped into this world, now’s my time to save however many I can, and help the rest to a peaceful departure. If a mother’s voice is what they need to hear, that’s what I give. Or a wife’s. And sometimes…” His voice trailed off.
“Sometimes what?” Ned still thought there was more to Jem than what he’d discovered so far.
Jem looked off to some far away place only he could see. “Sometimes,” he said, “more often the older I get, I hear someone, different ones, tellin’ me the right words to say, the music to sing. Even songs I’ve never heard before.”
Ned wasn’t sure he wanted to hear such talk. And he wasn’t sure he didn’t. “Will you sing to Nelson when his time comes?”
“We’ll likely be too busy by then. He won’t need me anyway. He’s got somebody waitin’ to show him the way. I can feel ‘em. Mybe even see ‘em.” He glanced at Ned, then away again. “It happens like that for certain folks. You’ll see some who pass with a look of such joyful recognition on their face as don’t seem humanly possible. And some who…well, never mind those. Just be glad of the joyful ones.”
________________________


But this is a forum of erotica writers, so here’s something completely different, even though the erotic parts don’t come until later. I didn’t satisfy my vision of the character’s voice this time—I wanted a sense of simplicity of mind and background but without any lack of intelligence. The story, “Sergeant Rae,” still did well enough, first in Kristina Wright’s Duty and Desire and then in Best Lesbian Romance 2013, even though it wasn’t quite the story I wanted to tell..

________________________

Sgt. Rae was so strong she could carry me at a run through gunfire and smoke and exploding mines. Two years later, she’s that strong again. With just one hand she can hold me from getting away, no matter how hard I struggle. Even her voice is enough to stop me at a dead run, so it doesn’t matter that she can’t run any more. And anyway, I’d never want to run away.
I’m smaller, but I’ve got my own kind of muscle, even if it doesn’t show. A mechanic in an armored tank unit has to be strong just to handle the tools you need, and if you’re a woman doing the job you need a whole extra layer of strength. I’m not an army mechanic any more, but I can still use tools; Sgt. Rae isn’t an army Sgt. any more, but she’ll always be in charge. At the town hall where she’s the police and fire department dispatcher, they tell me she’s got the whole place organized like it’s never been before.
In our house, or in the town, I’m supposed to just call her Rae these days, and mostly I remember. I’m just Jenny. In the bedroom, we don’t need names at all, except to wake each other when the bad dreams come, and whisper that everything’s all right now. Or close enough to handle, as long as we’re together.
Out here, though, on this trail I’ve made through the woods and across the stream, we play by my rules, and that means I’m Specialist 2nd Brown and she’s the ball-buster Staff Sergeant, even though neither of us has any use for balls.
She’ll be coming along the trail behind me any minute, coming to see what new contraption I’ve constructed. What she expects is something like the exercise stations I’ve built for her into every room in the house, chinning bars and railings and handgrips at different levels, and in a way that’s right, but with a different twist. She expects I’ll want her to order me to drop and do fifty push-ups or sit-ups, or run in place until I’m panting, but this time I want more.
I check the gears and pulleys one more time, even though I already know the tension is set right. It’s my own tension that’s nearly out of control. The posts and crossbars are rock-solid, while I’m shaking in my old fatigues, so nervous and horny that I can’t even tell which is which.
I hear the motor now. I could’ve made it run quieter, but if you’ve been where I’ve been, where we’ve both been, you want to be sure you know who’s coming around the bend.
She’s crossed the rocky ford in the stream where no regular wheelchair could have gone. I salvaged tracks from old snowmobiles at the repair shop where I work, and they’re as good as any armored tank tracks, even though they’re made of Kevlar instead of steel. Fine for this terrain, and even the steel kind got chewed up in the desert sand in Iraq.
_________________________


Wait a minute. You know what? After all this, maybe it’s better to just go with our guts. Or intuition, if you want a more delicate term. (Oh, wait, we write erotica!) Go with whatever floats your (metaphorical) pen. And the voices in your head.

Friday, October 3, 2014

Who's on First?

Spencer Dryden

 
 
 
This topic is as befuddling to me as the famous Abbot and Costello bit. I still don't know what deep third is. (Wait, 'I don't know' is on third.) I'm going to be reading Garce's post with pencil and paper. Lisabet's was every informative.
Some general reactions are the best I can do.
I like first person, but not in present tense, as in (dare I say it?) FSOG. It comes off as clumsy to me, like the writer is trying to have me in the scene. I'm a voyeur not a participant. It's hard to sustain dramatic tension over a long period in first person. (witness again, FSOG) The writer is cut off from devices such as the ever faithful, 'meanwhile'. Meanwhile is the bomb strapped to the leg of the dining room table unseen by the couple eating dinner. It radically alters the meaning of their conversation.
Most of my own inventory of short stories are first person, past tense. It's an easy vehicle for an inexperienced writer to drive. Some humor and good dialogue can bring plenty of entertainment to a 5,000-10,000 word story. 
 
I love spoken dialogue. My editor has to chide me to do more scene setting and to have characters display physical manifestations of the emotions expressed in dialogue. Some of my best stuff (IMO) is all dialogue microfiction. I don't know how it would be categorized. I wish there was a market or an anthology or two for this kind of work. (see below)
I've never tried writing exclusively in second person. I throw a 'you' around once in a while.  I don't get how you do it in a fiction piece. Maybe you could suggest some well written pieces.
I'm trying to do more third person work. Like I said, I don't know what deep third is. (Garce, you're up dude.) I have a tendency to drift from third person to omniscient within the same scene, something I see regularly as a reader. Apparently, it's not a good thing. Not according my editor who administered numerous jolts through the shock collar I wore when we were editing "Bliss".
That's about it for me. I'm going to stop before I reduce the sum total of human knowledge any farther.
So what's on second?
How about a little social commentary in an all dialogue piece?
 
 
At The Border
By Spencer Dryden
 
Fargo, North Dakota, August 28, 2020
 
“Officer, I wasn’t speeding. Why am I being stopped?”
“You failed to stop at the checkpoint, ma’am.”
“Checkpoint, what check point?”
“The one about a half mile back that you missed.”
“What’s the checkpoint for?”
“Pregnancy check, ma’am.”
“Pregnancy check?”
“Yes ma’am. We need a urine sample to be sure you’re not leaving the state to have an abortion.”
“And what if I am? You can’t stop me.”
“As a matter of fact, we can. Under the North Dakota Comprehensive Preservation of Life Act of 2020. You need to give us a urine sample before crossing into Minnesota to prove you’re not pregnant.”
“And if I don’t?”
“We can detain you under Article 616.”
“Article 616?”
“Yes, it’s a provision of the law that allows the Department of Health to restrict travel of any woman of child bearing age suspected of leaving the state for the purposes of an abortion.”
“I don’t understand, when did they get that power?”
“The state has had the power to restrict travel for public health purposes since the great influenza outbreak just after World War I.”
“But I’m not contagious.”
“Perhaps not, but if you’re travelling to have an abortion, we have the moral and legal authority to detain you.”
“This is outrageous.”
“No ma’am. What’s outrageous is the millions of lives terminated every year by women like you.”
“Women like me?”
“Yes, women like you. We know you have had unprotected sex within the last 24 hours and since this is the middle of your cycle there is a high probability that you will become pregnant.”
“How can you possibly know that?”
“Ma’am you seem to be without shame in your texts, e-mails and phone calls. Don’t you know that people are listening?”
“You’re monitoring me? How can you possibly justify that?”
“Crime prevention ma’am. We’re preventing a premeditated murder of an unborn child.”
“My cycle, how could you possible know that?”
“A very sophisticated data mining algorithm. We can predict your ovulation within a day.”
“Jesus.”
“Exactly ma’am. Jesus and the people of North Dakota want to end abortion.”
“But I’m not pregnant.”
“Then pee in the cup and prove it.”
“And if I do that?”
“Then I can just red-band you and let you go.”
“Just…red band me?” Just what does that mean?”
“It means you’ll need to return and be tested in another three days. You have two days of maximum fertility ahead.”
“I can’t believe you can do this.”
“We can and we will.”
“But what about my rights? It’s my body.”
“But not your uterus. That belongs to the state.”
 
Copyright 8/29/13 Spencer Dryden. No part of this material may be copied or reused without permission of the author.
 


 
 
 
 
 

Thursday, October 2, 2014

Another Post About How I Have No Idea What I'm Doing

by Giselle Renarde


I'm not a "trained" writer by any stretch of the imagination. I have a degree, but it's not in English or Literature, though I did take an English Literature course along the way. Been there, done that, got The Norton Anthology to prove it.

When I was in high school, there was a class called Writer's Craft. It was a creative writing course. Some of my friends took it. I didn't.

I wrote stories when I was a kid. I wrote a lot of stories, actually. My Grade Three teacher told my mom I would grow up to be a writer. I dismissed that idea. I wanted to be a number of things over the course of my young life, but a writer was never one of them.

And yet here I am, a professional writer. Funny how that happens, huh?

When I started writing, I knew NOTHING. Less than nothing, because I didn't know the market either. I've talked here before about my first round of edits on my first ebook (The Birthday Gift) with my first publisher (the now defunct Dark Eden Press). It made me want to quit writing forever. It was in that moment that I realized how little I knew.

I felt really stupid. And I was really stupid.

I had no idea what point of view was. Seriously. I didn't. I'd never thought about it. I started my career writing letter-style erotica for Hustler Fantasies and the like, so I guess I somehow knew enough to write a letter in the first person. Maybe I just lucked out. No, DEFINITELY I just lucked out.

So... The Birthday Gift was (and still is!) written in the third person and I'm pretty sure that was the first time I'd ever written a book wherein the "I" was "she." I was extremely not good at it. Wish I'd known that at the time, but my editor was quick to enlighten me.

I've never been the kind of author who confuses tenses or head-hops, thank goodness, but my very first editor had to teach me about "deep third." Did I have any idea what that was? Nope. But she helped me understand that in this genre you really need to get inside the character's head. It's a lot like writing in the first person.

Actually, I've spend the past three days revising a story that was originally published six years ago, which means I probably wrote it seven years ago. Yup, you read that right: THREE days revising a SHORT story. It was in rough shape, and I'll tell you why: I learned writing on the job. And when you're learning, you're not always producing glorious prose.

Early in my career, everything I wrote in the third person was awkward and clunky and just... really really not good. Not that I realized it at the time. If an editor told me I needed to shake up my sentence structure, I'd go overboard and create these sentences that were just incomprehensible. I was trying too hard. I needed time to relax into my writing.

I've always been more comfortable writing in the first person (past tense--present just keeps slipping into past which is why I've never written anything longer than about 2,000 words in first person present), and it's kind of my default. I especially like the unreliable narrator aspect of it. It's nice not to be the authority. The character can really take over and misspeak and be wrong about stuff and that's okay.

I also feel like when I'm writing in third I need to showcase MY voice, whereas writing in first person feels like slipping fully into the character's skin. It's a wonderful kind of escapism. This character steps into my life and I get to become her completely. Or him.

So it's pretty well established that I had no effing clue what I was doing when I started life as a writer. Do I know what I'm doing now, 8+ years in?

Good question. I know what point of view is...

I guess that's a start.

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Diction Plus Tone Equals Voice



I’m not a poet and I don’t even see myself that way, but I have the fundamental key I think to a poets nature.  I love words and language.  This applies to point of view. 

I’ve been studying a couple of craft books by Mary Oliver, a pulitzer prise winning poet.  She has several chapters which I need to read several times on the subject of voice.  In poetry it’s called “diction”, voice and tone.  Diction refers to your choice of words.  The overall effect of this choice of words is called “tone”.  The diction and tone together give rise to the “persona” of the person telling the poem or story.  In my opinion this “persona” is the key to your choice of point of view, and most especially if it’s the first person point of view.

Erotica more than other forms of genre fiction, except maybe horror, is a very physical and personal form of expression. I’m talking about literary erotica in particular.  I believe it should be written with some immediacy from the senses from the dark waters of the unconscious.  Some writers like Anais Nin can get cerebral about it and still make it work, but she’s an exception because of her ability to color it with the mysteries of a character’s inner quirks.  People should be able to feel what you’re describing physically and emotionally.  You do this partly by letting them fill in the blanks in your description, but also very often by speaking in the voice of experience of the deciding character.  The most common mistake I see in erotic writing, or at least the method I take issue with, is speaking  from the main character without giving them a specific personality in that voice.  That voice, when you get it right, can be the most fun part of reading the story.  A reader will forgive you for a lot if you can get that voice right.  And giving that voice a persona can really drive the story forward for you as a writer.  But it has to be a voice that matches the character.

In poetry, and I’d say also just as much in prose, the sound of the word, its accuracy and its meaning creates the atmosphere of a poem.  In old school horror writing like Lovecraft or Poe it seems like the story is 70 percent about atmosphere.  The author is making a slow hand build up to a final effect that rises from the gathered gloom.  In “Masque of the Red Death” the first half of the story is dedicated entirely to the description of the rooms in Prince Prospero’s castle, with almost no character description except to let you know he’s a selfish guy.  “The Cask of Amontillado” is a short expository blast about Montressor’s unexplained hatred of Fortunato and then therest of the story is his first person description of the cellar they’re going down too.  “The Tell Tale Heart” told from the first person is the obtuse and obsessive voice of a dangerous loon.  What is interesting about that voice is the immediate lack of self awareness in the speaker, his capacity for self delusion:

“ . . . TRUE! --nervous --very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad? The disease had sharpened my senses --not destroyed --not dulled them. Above all was the sense of hearing acute. I heard all things in the heaven and in the earth. I heard many things in hell. How, then, am I mad? Hearken! and observe how healthily --how calmly I can tell you the whole story. . . .”

Poe was actually onto a great spiritual truth here about the nature of evil.  Evil does not know itself.  Evil is ego gone wild and refusing to see itself.  But what is also special about this voice is – it is a voice.  A distinct voice.  The voice of a dangerous loon.  You know this guys personality.  You know who he would vote for for president and why.   This is the carefully thought out effect of Diction + Tone = Voice.  You feel this man, wide eyed and self absorbed grab you by the collar, like The Ancient Mariner or a wino in an alley, and haul you away from what you were doing to make you listen to his story from beginning to end no matter what.  He’s your crazy Uncle at Thanksgiving dinner except this guy kills people and cuts out their heart.  This is ego gone boundless and is at the heart of true evil, the absence of empathy.

Here’s the First Person Present Tense voice of another evil maniac, very different from Poe’s:

“  . . . At the brownstone next to Evelyns a woman – high heels, great ass – leaves without locking her door.  Price follows her with his gaze and when he hears footsteps coming down the hallway toward us he turns around straightens his Versace tie ready to face whatever.  Courtney opens the door and she’s wearing a Krizia cream silk blouse, a Krizia rust tweed skirt and silk satin d’Orsay pumps from Manolo Blahnik. . . “
                        "American Psycho"  Brett Easton Ellis

Now wait – read that again.  He doesn’t just describe her clothes, he knows their brand, how much they cost probably and even what store they come from.  Throughout the book wall street master of the universe and human monster Patrick Bateman will do this with every person he meets, it will become his signature and an expression of his governing characteristic, a manic obsession with social status.  He kills a male friend with a fashionably expensive stainless steel ax  possibly for simply having a nicer business card than his.  This a great device.  The first time you read him doing that, you think its annoying.  The third time its really annoying.  After reading him do that every single time it begins to sink in for you - this guy is dangerously nuts.

And how about this distinctive voice, the narrator Mattie Ross from Charles Portis' great book "True Grit":

"  . . . People do not give it credence that a fourteen year old girl could leave home and go off in the wintertime to avenge her father's blood but it did not seem so strange then, although I will say it did not happen everyday. . . ."

The use of the outmoded word "credence" as a noun and the lack of contractions (did not) give it the 19th century parlor room formality of a daguerreotype.


Here are two of my voices, from stories (published) told from first person voices:

“ . . . The old prize fighters would bust your nose or your ribs.  A punch to the kidney that would make you piss blood for a couple days.  We sex fighters, we bust your will to live.  We take away your will to be free.  People look naked to us.  We see inside your mind.    You just think you know what you want, bitch.  I know what you really want, because that’s how I get you.  That’s how I take you down.  I look at you bitch - I know what you want way better than you do.  I know it even before you know it.  That’s because I see you.  I see you like God sees you. . . .”             
                            from “The Peanut Butter Shot”

Crude language.  Short punchy sentences like jabs to the face.  You don’t like this guy.  But you’re curious to find out what’s going to happen to him because you get a sense of what kind of a person he is.  Yeah, reader, that’s how I get you.  That’s how I take you down.


And then there is this paragraph (Sorry Lisabet, I know you’ve seen this paragraph about fifty times at least  by now, I just really like it) which begins one of my vampire stories

“ . . . . Blood has a range of taste, as scent has a range of aroma. Blood has a high level taste
and an under taste. It is a blending of elements like music. This is also the way of scent.
The under aroma will show you there is a trail and betrays to you the direction. If the
scent becomes fresher you are following the creature that produced it, so you must use
the under scent to know which direction is older and which is newer. It is as though the
air is filled with singing voices and you are picking out a single voice. The high scent
will tell you about the individual, the condition of the individual, if it is injured or sick,
horny or filled with fear. It will tell you how to catch him, where he is likely to run to. To
acquire the high scent the animal, or myself, must pause to commune with the air and pay
attention. Close the eyes. Hold the nose still and just so. Let the night air speak. It is the
same with the deep taste of blood, except that scent is on the move, and if you are tasting
the blood – well. It is no longer on the move. . . . .” 
                         (Opening Paragraph “The Lady and the Unicorn”)



There is a lot going on in this paragraph.  There is a deliberate styling of Diction + Tone = Voice.  This is the voice of a sensitive young woman while at the same time being the voice of a practiced predator and hunter of humans.  An affection for the night, an ironic humor.  An absence of empathy.  She never says she's dangerous, she never boasts, but by the end of the paragraph she doesn't have to.

People write things their own way.  But in my case what I love is language and the sound of language.  Its why I want to see characters get a voice.  It's how I love them.