Sunday, December 7, 2008

hot new Holiday Series starts this week!

Catch the New Series Mistletoe Magic
coming this December from Ellora’s Cave




Dec. 12: #1: Breath of Magic by Regina Carlysle:

Powerhouse attorney Liza Woodward knows a little something about losing control and it’s been her life’s mission never to do it again, especially when it comes to small-town lawyer Tyler Blackwell. Ty takes one look at the woman he’s always loved and knows it’s way past time he seduced away the control she wears like a suit of armor. It will take a steady hand, a bit of dominance, and a little breath of magic from a Christmas Elf to win this sassy Texas woman.


Dec. 17: #2 Touch of Magic by Desiree Holt:

Maddie Woodward is in a pickle. The last person she expects to see when she returns to the family ranch for one last Christmas is her former lover, Zach Brennan. He’s hotter as he ever was, all male and determined to get her naked. She’s just as determined to show him she’s over him—until she ends up in his bed, enjoying the wildest sex of her life. A night of uncontrolled, erotic sex shows her that Zach is far from out of her life. Now if she can just get him to help her convince her sisters not to sell the ranch…

Dec. 19: #3 Whispers of Magic by Cindy Spencer Pape:

Hoping to get back in Santa’s good graces, Sparkle the elf takes on a difficult assignment—arrange a merry Christmas for photojournalist Jenna Woodward. Jenna has just lost her parents, her job, and her cheating “fiancĂ©”. Rancher Mitch Sterling doesn’t want his face on a book, but he does want Jenna back in his life. He offers a deal—he’ll sign off, if she agrees to be at his mercy for one day. Jenna left him once because she was afraid of his Dominant lifestyle. Now, with help from a magical snowstorm, Mitch has twenty-four hours of tempestuous passion to convince her that she’ll love being his sub.

Dec. 24: #4: Elven Magic by Regina Carlysle, Desiree Holt, & Cindy Spencer Pape:

When three of Santa’s elves were ordered to provide happily ever afters for the Woodward sisters, they promised themselves a celebration if they were successful. Sharing a motel room during their assignment created a whole new level of sexual awareness among them, where boundaries were breaking down mentally day by day. With arousal at its peak after they all succeed, they decide to indulge in a sexual game of Truth or Dare, which will give a whole new slant to their friendship and allow them to explore their darkest fantasies—maybe even love.
Reader Advisory: Contains m/m/f sexual encounters.

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Guest author Brenna Lyons

The Crew of The Grip would like to welcome guest author, Brenna Lyons:

Stereotypes, Archetypes And Author's License
By Brenna Lyons

Talking to editors is often very disheartening. Authors are told that publishers want three-dimensional, unique, complex characters. At the same time, authors are often discouraged from providing them...or, at the very least, from providing ones that don't match their own ethnicity.

At RT 2006, a panel of several African American editors resulted in some hard feelings. The editors reportedly said that non-AA authors shouldn't write AA characters, because they aren't AA and can't know... One African American colleague of mine reports that she was told to change her main characters from Hispanic to AA, because "No one would buy Hispanic characters written by an African American woman."

Okay, let's take a break for a moment and dissect that. The complaint isn't that the AA author got fact A-12 wrong or mistranslated X word. The complaint is that she isn't qualified to write a character who doesn't match her in ethnicity.

The fact is, authors write about people they aren't and things they haven't experienced every day. It's called researching for the book or world-building. It's safe to say that I'm not a man, not a fairy, not a zombie, and not an alien, though that last one has been postulated before.

Sometimes, what authors write comes about from extrapolation from what we do know and empathy. Having built a world with certain mores, laws, and cultural expectations...and a character with certain physiological, psychological, and emotional attributes, the author can further extrapolate and empathize the character into appropriate responses.

Sometimes, it comes about from true research. If you're writing a gay man, asking a gay man if the scenes read true isn't out of the ballpark of possibility. When writing an AA character, a Caucasian author may well base certain facets of the character on AA friends.

If authors waited to write something, until we were or had experienced it, most of the fiction market would never get written.

Which brings me to stereotypes. In the same way that editors discourage authors from writing characters that don't share their ethnicity, readers and editors often want to stick to stereotypical characters.

Authors of AA characters are often told (even if they are AA authors themselves) that their characters "sound too white." The truth is that not every AA person in America was raised in such a manner as to have become fluent in what Dave Chappelle often calls "street vernacular." Even if the person does, making a tally sheet of how much of the character's waking moments he/she must default to street vernacular disregards the character in favor of a stereotype.

New authors often ask how to write men (if the author is female) or women (if the tables are turned). These authors are struggling with the line between believability and stereotype.

The fact is, how a character reacts has much less to do with being male or female and much more to do with likes, dislikes, environment, personal expectations and the expectations of others, temperament, phobias, physicality, and so forth. Not all men like sports, and not all women like to shop. You have to build the character and then let that character react.

There are many ways to build a character. Some authors set the psychology and let the character and plot unfold around it. Some build the plot then rationalize the psychology that would precipitate certain key responses or turning points.

And some use archetypes. There are many lists of archetypes. A search on the web will bring up everything from the Jungian archetypes to tarot archetypes to Pearson's model...and many more.

The trick to using archetypes is to remember that all archetypes are, by design, somewhat two-dimensional. A good character, like a real person, should have several main archetypes identifiable in his/her personality. Ideally...and realistically for most people, these individual archetypal drives should war within the character, when a conflict arises between two possible archetypal responses to a situation.

The complications to all of this come in a couple of core problems.

You will never be able to erase the safe-zone some readers and editors have created. Even if you base your character on a real person, someone out there with a personal nit about the subject is going to claim the character is unrealistic and may be vociferous on the subject.

If you mean to parody, you may rightfully dismiss the idea of complex, three-dimensional characterization in favor of the singular archetype and/or the stereotypical character. But, be warned that such characters easily slip off the narrow beam between amusing to annoying. And, some stereotype representations may be seen as "in poor taste."

Finally, writing something you don't know requires utilizing a "head space." If an author cannot get inside an alien psyche and think for the character, the characterization may come off erratic and/or flat.


TYGERS (Renegades series 1)


Blurb--

If Katheyn O'Hanlon had one wish, it would be a memory of her childhood and the source of her nightmares. Psi-linked to her four-year-old nephew, she is dragged back to Pittsburgh to confront a renegade psychic. Kyle's father has been brutally murdered, and Kyle claims his toy tigers have done the deed led by Ty, the Siberian. It is up to Katheryn to remember where Ty is and how to destroy him before he destroys everything she cares about.


Is Kyle haunted by the homicidal family ghost or being driven insane by the horrorscope trapped in the depths of Katheryn's mind? Can Katheryn keep Keith Randall, an old flame, who takes the job of Kyle's counselor, out of the line of fire while she does her work when all Keith wants is to be wherever Katheryn is?


Excerpt--


Whether or not that would change her plans was immaterial to Dianna. She could not permit Katheryn to walk blithely into an ambush. What choices her daughter made after that were beyond Dianna's control. Katheryn had survived once. If she was as resilient as an adult, and Dianna was sure that she was, Katheryn might have nothing to fear in coming home.


She moved to the phone to page Katheryn, but she froze with the receiver in her hand. The sound behind her was unmistakably a growl. She turned slowly, taking in the scene behind her in horror.


They were there-the tigers, circling around her. They crouched as if preparing to pounce, their shoulders bunching and their tails twitching like a nest of cats playing with a mouse. Dianna swallowed painfully and backed toward the wall. The tigers advanced as she retreated, keeping their distance constant as their claws clicked on the tile floor.


Kyle's story flashed through her mind. The tigers had attacked Peter. They really did it, didn't they? They killed Peter. The receiver dropped from her fingers, and she covered her face with her hands.


"It's not real. He's playing with me," she chanted over and over again.


She lowered her hands and sobbed in relief. Gone. There was no one in the kitchen but herself. As her shaking subsided, her anger rose. Carol may hate it, but Kyle had to know the truth. Maybe if he knew the truth, he would reject Ty, and this could end...she hoped. Ty had a way of getting what he wanted.


Dianna pushed off the wall and stormed up the stairs toward Kyle's room. She'd wake him up from the damned nap he'd fallen into after their talk if she had to. Kyle could stop this. She was sure of it, and he would stop it. Dianna would do anything she had to do to make sure of it.


She glanced up at the open door to his room. The tigers were scattered around the floor. She hesitated for a moment then forged on with a growl of irritation. Toys. Just toys. Despite whatever sleight of hand Ty was employing, they were just toys. She had to remember that.


She glanced up again. They were lined up outside the doorway, waiting for her. Dianna squared her shoulders and walked at them. "You're not real," she informed them. "I'll walk right through you. You can't hurt me."


The tigers moved their shoulders in preparation to attack, and Dianna laughed lightly at the threat. As she reached the white tiger, the one Kyle thought of as Ty, his paw flashed out. A searing pain tore at her ankle, and she recoiled several yards. She looked at her leg in shock. Five welts burned an angry red through her pantyhose.



Thursday, December 4, 2008

Don't Stereotype Me

Stereotypes can be hurtful or fun. I suppose it just depends on which side of the pigeonholing you fall on. What do I mean by fun? Well, playing on stereotypes when I’m writing is a pretty good time to me. It’s my own little ploy to help dispel some of the stereotypes that seem to plague our society. Let’s run down a few just for giggles.

Asians have high IQs. They are smarter than most in Math and Science and they are horrible drivers.
Christians are homophobic. They are blinded by God and will recruit you if you go near them.
African Americans can dance.
White Guys can't dance.
Italians are in the mob.
Irish are alcoholics and love to fight.
African Americans hate to work and love welfare.
Germans are Nazis or fascists.
Middle Easterners hate Americans.
Russians are violent.
Gay men are feminine while lesbian women are masculine and either will try to recruit you if you go near them.
African Americans play basketball and love fried chicken and watermelon.
Women are neat and like to clean.
Men are slobs.
Asian men have smallest penis size while African American men are hung like horses.
The further south you go, the lower IQs drop.
Jewish people are cheap
Cops eat donuts.
Mexicans steal jobs from Americans.


Should I go on? Nah, I think you get the idea.

a jumping-off point

Stereotypes are fun to play with. I have fun leading the reader along the garden path, thinking they know where I’m going with a character…and then taking a total left turn.

People are complex, and if we’re writing even remotely true to life, then our characters have to be too. I have a whole series built around geeks. Some of them have elaborate home gyms set up in their basements…and actually use them. Others might have a large collection of firearms, or an unexpected flair for gourmet cooking. One of my cowboy heroes is an Ivy-League educated attorney. Another writes mysteries. I have s computer-hacking dragon. A strong, powerful gargoyle is a comic-book artist, and a selkie is a children’s librarian. Mixing things up is fun. One heroine’s deceased grandmother was a lesbian…figure that one out! But it works in the story because life is like that. People refuse to be relegated to tidy lists, and that’s part of the fun of writing, to capture those quirks that make people unique. Face it, quirky people are a whole lot more interesting than one-dimensional archetypes.

Now mind you, I’m not saying the archetypes are useless. They're handy for those walk-on roles often give us a starting point. We can introduce the hard nosed cop, and if he’s only going to be in the book for five minutes, we may not need to flesh him out any more than that. If he ends up being around for a while, though, we might find out that he takes ballroom dance lessons on Friday nights, or volunteers as a clown at the local children’s hospital. The snooty rich housewife might be enough for a half-page encounter, but if she becomes a significant character, we might find out that she’s really trying desperately to hide that she grew up homeless. Sometimes it doesn’t happen until book two or three, that an insignificant character develops into something deeper. That’s okay. We use those same impressions in real life. We see the patient librarian, or the harried postal worker, and our mind files them as such and moves on, until we get to know them better. That's when we find out that the librarian is into punk rock or the mailman crochets.

As the wise Dakota said earlier in the week, sometimes it’s okay for the cop to eat a donut. But sometimes he eats sushi…or even cooks it.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Characters

I wanted to be uber witty today, because I like to think I am an amusing person. But when deciding which of my non-stereotypical characterization processes to write about I realized...I don't have any processes. None at all really.

I don't create character sketches (I know, the HORROR!) I create stories. Then I pick characters that fit my story, I don't build the story around the people. I think I do okay. There are definate "trends" to my characters. My heroines are always kick ass, smart, and funny. The heroes are always hot, a little broody, and completely smitten with their counterpart.

Brynn touched on secondary characters yesterday. I have problems with secondary characters. Mainly, I don't have many of them. They gay guys always seem to get a younger sister in which to confide in. The women may have one friend who is massive comic relief, but other than that my stories focus on the TWO.

As I said, I don't create character outlines. They act and talk in the book like they act and talk in my head. If they do something stereotypical I don't make a point of pulling it out of the book. They are people like the rest of us. Sometimes cops eat donuts...I'm just sayin'.

XoXoXo
Dakota Rebel

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

All Characters Are Important

I spend a lot of time avoiding stereotypes. Blondes are not always dumb. Computer geniuses and scientists are not always geeks. Heroes aren’t McGuiver and don’t always have the answers to any question or situation they confront. Heroines aren’t golden-haired princesses who have birds and fairy dust floating around them as they do no wrong. Moms and dads aren’t the Cleavers. Gay men aren’t uber-feminine. The bad guy isn’t always evilest evil who ever existed.

Stereotypes for characters can go on and on. Let’s face it stereotypes are easy to write. Many of us spend a lot of time doing character-building for our main characters—at least, we had better be doing this. But what happens when we have to write the next door neighbour or the gas station attendant or a cop? We fall back on stereotypes. We have preconceived notions of how these people should/will act. This is one of the trickiest places in a manuscript. My suggestion for this is to do a small sketch for this characters. Not a lot. A half page. All characters are important. Don’t let the secondaries take over the book, but don’t neglect them, either.

Monday, December 1, 2008

The character behind the name

Everyone knows that all gangsters are Italian and wear cheap black suits. All southerners talk with a slow molasses accent and chew on grass or spitting tobacco. All bimbos are blond. All surfers say "dude" a lot. All good guys wear white hats. Right?

Well, not necessarily so. When writing, its so easy to fall back on the same tired old stereotypes. Developing fresh characters is work--hard work. Main characters aren't so difficult. After all, we know our hero and heroine better than our secondary characters. But those others in the background require some thought if we want them to be more than cardboard cutouts.

Take the gangster stereotype as an example. A small amount of research would reveal that organized crime has spread to encompass all ethnic types and therefore all sorts of clothing. A gangster could be anything from Russian to Chinese to American. Clothing styles and distinctive marks such as tattoos are optional. Why not make that bad guy different?

Personally, I think that every single person has individual traits and interests that make them who they are. Why shouldn't our characters be the same? Why can't we have a man who not only chops wood, but does needlepoint in the evening? Or a woman who drives trucks for a living? Or an opera star who loves country music? How about a detective who loves police procedurals?

One of the easiest ways to make a character both distinctive and memorable is to "flesh out" their personal likes and dislikes in clothing--or to place them in a situation where they must dress against their personal preferences. For instance, every male from the outside who finds himself in Mystic Valley must deal with dressing in a kilt style garment. How each man makes those adjustments reveals something about who he is.

Personally, I think the most fascinating part of writing is to find out who the characters really are as the story unfolds.

anny