By Lisabet Sarai
Do
I seem mad to you? If so, they are responsible. They've driven me mad
with their beauty and indifference.
They
don't even bother to hunt anymore. They spend their days in their
king-sized coffin, alabaster limbs entwined in a frozen tableau of
passion. They devote their nights to surfing the Internet, listening
to Bach or Dvořák, or lounging on their deck, the endless grid of
the city sparkling below them.
Except,
of course, for the nights when they feed.
Occasionally,
on rainy days when there's no risk, I muster the courage to lift the
polished rosewood lid of their communal casket and peek inside. I'm
always startled by the scent that rises from their inert forms,
orange blossoms and sun-warmed stone, no hint of dankness or decay.
Their exquisite pallor complements the perfection of their naked
bodies. They seem like statues modeled from translucent, milky glass.
He
slumbers with one palm cupping her pert breast, the other arm wrapped
around her waist. Her honey-brown hair fans over his chest, fine as
spider silk. She curls her fist around his cock, which is rampant
even as they sleep. The bold gesture contrasts with her innocent
features. She has the smooth cheeks, pointed chin and plump lips of a
teenage cheerleader.
My
fingers twitch. The urge to trace the shape of that sweet, ripe mouth
is almost irresistible. More times than I can count, I've seen her
girlish face grinning and smeared with gore. It doesn't matter. She
will always be my angel, my inspiration, my heart's desire, my doom.
My beloved mistress.
My
master is equally magnificent in his own way, with a dancer's subtly
muscled arms and legs and a head of glorious ebony curls like some
pale gypsy. He has a bookish look, with a high forehead rising above
bushy black brows and a sensitive mouth that cries out for kisses.
I've
never dared to lean close and take advantage of his immobility, much
as I ache to feel the chill of his flesh against my own. If I gave
way to temptation, would he know? I'm not certain that their
death-like daytime sleep stills their minds the way it freezes their
bodies. I doubt he'd punish me, if he discovered my transgression. He
knows I'd welcome the mark of his bullwhip or the icy invasion of his
knife. No, more likely he'd mock me, or simply ignore me, refusing to
acknowledge my existence. I couldn't bear that.
The
sight of them, locked together in eternal stasis, holds me captive.
Blood pours into my cock, blood I know they'd savor if they'd only
take it, until I'm hard as the concrete walls of the basement room
where they sleep. My pulse pounds in my temples as my futile erection
strains my trousers. I am their creature, their slave, stunned into
helpless worship by their unearthly beauty.
I
know they need me. That should satisfy me – the knowledge that
without me they'd might fry or starve or succumb to some overly
zealous reader of horror fiction. Month after month, year after year,
I guard them and I procure them their victims. It's my privilege to
serve them. That should be enough. But I want more from them, God
help me, more than I can ever hope they'll give.
From
Renfield’s Lament by Lisabet Sarai
Our
topic this fortnight is “Craving”. One can crave many things, of
course: food, water, sweets, alcohol, drugs, attention, fame, money.
For authors of erotic fiction, though, carnal yearning naturally
takes precedence.
Unlike
food or water, one can live without sex (as unappealing as that might
sound), yet the craving for sex – or more commonly, for a
particular sexual object - may well be more powerful than physical
hunger or thirst. Sexual desire can be all-encompassing – physical,
emotional, and spiritual. It can strip us bare, lead us to take
actions we’d never consider if not under its irrational influence.
Crimes of passion demonstrate the strength of this craving, its
capability to render us temporarily insane with want.
Indeed
the experience of sexual craving, that desperate longing for the
desired other, may well be more intense than the pleasure achieved in
its fulfillment. Yet erotica frequently focuses more on the latter
than on the former.
When
people ask me for my personal definition of erotica, I tell them
erotica is fiction that portrays sexual desire. According to my
definition, it’s possible to write erotica in which no actual
sexual acts occur.
This
is not a fashionable perspective. These days it’s tough to publish
a story without at least one orgasm. A more popular definition of
erotica is “explicit fiction intended to sexually arouse the
reader”. Implicit here is the notion of satisfaction (either
physical or vicarious). A tale of unrequited craving without the
“payoff” may leave this sort of reader feeling cheated or
frustrated. I guess I can sympathize. After all, so many people feel
dissatisfied with their real-world sex lives; why would they want to
be frustrated by the sexy fiction they choose to read as well?
As
for me, I’m actually more interested in the desire than I am in the
sex itself. I admire an author who can vividly evoke the state of
neediness associated with acute sexual craving. One of the best tales
in this category that I’ve encountered recently is Preston Avery’s
“Won’t Last the Week”, in Tenille Brown’s recent anthology
Can’t Get Enough. The
narrator
meets
the
woman
of
his
dreams
at
a
party.
They
spend
the
night
on
the
beach,
so
entranced
by
one
another
that
they
forget
to
exchange
phone
numbers.
She isn't skinny like the girls
I usually go for, like my ideal “on paper” woman, but curved and
soft and she fits me just right. Her breasts are big with a delicious
slope to them, and I know they will overflow my grasp. I could bury
my face in the valley between them and never come up for air. I could
have seconds and thirds and fourths of her and die a gluttonous happy
man. She does everything I lead her into. I don't ask – words are
still lost to us. The first time I lower one of my hands to those
gorgeous mounds, hidden between a thin blue cotton shirt, she doesn't
protest of push me away- she arches into me, into my touch, and makes
the most beautiful noise in her throat. That moment, those moments,
are all that I can feel. The future is as unreal to me as a unicorn
on the planet Saturn. That place where names and phone numbers matter
is at least a world away.
As the week goes on, dreams and
fantasies of the lost woman consume the narrator. He wanders through
his days in a trance of longing. He spends his nights re-envisioning
their connection and rubbing his cock raw. Will he somehow manage to
find her? Or will he go mad with need and frustration? The beautiful
urgency of this story left me in wet wonder.
In fact, at the end of the tale,
the poor guy does find his dream girl, against all odds. The story,
though, is not really about that happy ending. Its focus is on
narrator’s craving, so powerful it totally overwhelms everything
else in his life.
And what about a story where the
narrator does not get what he or she wants so badly? Can that
still be erotic? I invite you to read the rest of Renfield’s
Lament, over in the ERWA gallery. One of my goals in writing this
story was to create a tale where the desires of the protagonist are
ultimately frustrated. In fact the narrator does have an orgasm and
achieve physical release. This, however, does not satisfy his
craving.
Can I call this tale of
unrequited desire “erotica”? Is it arousing? What do you think?
Lisabet:
ReplyDeleteWelcome back and congratulations on being selected for Maxim's best of 2013. The partial list of contributors I saw reads like a pantheon of the goddesses.
Your definition of erotica is very interesting: When people ask me for my personal definition of erotica, I tell them erotica is fiction that portrays sexual desire. According to my definition, it’s possible to write erotica in which no actual sexual acts occur.
I don't have a well formed personal definition of erotica but I agree with your conclusion that it is difficult to place a story labeled 'erotica' that lacks overt sex. From a writers standpoint, the danger of overplaying the build up is that the eventual sex may leave the reader dissatisfied anyway. In your works that I have read there is always a nice balance between anticipation and fulfillment. I have to saunter over to the Gallery and check out Renfield's Lament
Hi, Spencer,
DeleteIt's good to be back, much as I love traveling.
Where is this list of people in Maxim's MBBNE 2013? Everyone's mentioning it but I haven't seen it.
Actually, the reason I gave Renfield's Lament to the gallery was that I thought Maxim might like it for next year's volume. He's partial to dark erotica, and this is about as dark as it comes.
I like your definition of erotica, Lisabet. I think it's not unlike my own definition, "literature that explores and celebrates the human sexual experience in any of its manifestations, from attraction to desire to chemistry to sexual interactions of various kinds." As you see, I'm sort of trying to cover all the bases, but I might pick "desire" as the flagship element if I had to choose a flagship element; and I'm certainly with you in considering physical sex acts to be among the options in erotic literature, rather than obligatory.
ReplyDeleteI don't proselytize my definition LOL. But I've moved beyond being interested in sexual activity for its own sake, if I ever was.
DeleteP.S. Since there is a myth out there that erotica is strictly a "women's field," I'd like to take a moment to note that in addition to the "goddesses" featured in the partial list Spencer saw, the Mammoth 13 table of contents includes at least half a dozen authors whom I know to be men (including your own Garce), and several more who I believe are men (or whose names suggest that they're probably male).
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteBtw, when I say "whom I know to be men," I don't mean to make it sound like I'm outing them! I just mean these are writers with "male" bylines whom I've crossed paths with enough to know that (barring any elaborate deceptions) they do indeed, at the personal level, identify or present as men.
DeleteJeremy:
DeleteI only saw a partial list. I'm glad to know the pantheon of the gods is also represented.
Amen. (ah "A men?")
DeleteRemember when as a teenager, that high school girl or boy who took our breath away. not only our breath but our appetite, sleep and the ability to put two and two together. How powerful it all was. How we equated it to 'being in love'. Perhaps that's where desire manifests the strongest. When unrequited.
ReplyDeleteYou've put your finger on exactly what I want to evoke in my fiction. That intensity, that power, that exists more or less totally independent of physical reality.
DeleteHi Lisbet!
ReplyDeleteI think it is. With sex or desire very often the wanting, and the more intense the better is more thrilling than the acquiring which too often turns to staleness.
Garce
The fulfillment can definitely be a let down.
Delete(Thanks for reading my stuff!)
Have you seen "Only Lovers Left Alive" with Tom Hiddleston and Tilda Swinton? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1714915/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_13
ReplyDeleteTheir vampires remind me a lot of your description of them...the movie is very well done, very artistic, and very moody.
As for the "having" being dull compared to the "wanting", I guess that's pretty much true of everything in life then. What we can imagine is always way better than the reality, which inevitably disappoints us compared to what we were anticipating.
But sexual pleasure for me, is the sole exception. Yes, I had my share of disappointing lays that, to quote a blues song, "Hardly made me put a wrinkle in my sheets". But on the other hand, when it's good...well then, nothing can come so close to all of the magic of fantasies as feeling nirvana when coupling with someone just as into you as you are into him/her. It's the closest I've ever felt to being able to escape the confines of my own skin and body, to meet in the middle with someone else's mind, while our bodies are locked in self-perpetuating pleasures. Though rare, those kinds of experiences make life worth living.
It's that kind of magic that I try to capture in my writing, and that I seek in erotica. So personally, I'd be disappointed with no "pay-off".
Hello, Fiona,
DeleteThanks for the movie recommendation. I love Tilda Swinton.
I'm not surprised by your comment. From what you've said in comments, I know you're an intensely physical person. I'm just the opposite. Even when I was in my sex goddess phase, the focus was more in my head/heart than in my body.
You're lucky.
I don't know how "lucky" it is to be so unlike most other women. Sexually I think more like a man, but I'm a woman. This means I'm never in agreement with other women when they're complaining (inevitably) about how much sex their man wants. I'm like, "So what's wrong with that? I mean if you married him, he must be a good lay, right? So why don't you want it as often as possible?" The silence and the murderous looks I get from some women is enough to make me keep my mouth shut the next time I'm in the beauty salon.
DeleteI'm convinced that's part of why my books don't sell much, besides my total invisibility to most readers. I write the way I think, and most women don't think like me...but they're my audience. Maybe I should market my books to men? But most male-written erotica I've read involves vignettes of sex scenes, with no back-story or plot-arc. I like those too, when I'm in the mood for a "quickie", but I prefer there to be actual reasons for me to care about how perfectly tab A fits into slot B. Then let the wild monkey sex commence! (Actually, from what I've read, I would make an excellent Bonobo monkey. They use sexual contact for every social interaction. That's what I want to be in my next life!)
I think there are plenty of other women like you. I'm just not one of them.
DeleteAnd if it makes you feel any better, my books don't sell either. I spent more money for marketing last month than I made. Sigh.
As for Bonobos - have you read Garce's "Pinkie" story? It's up at ERWA.
Fiona, it sounds like the male-authored erotica you've found your way to is just stroke lit. However, if you look at the best-respected collections of erotic short stories (not counting those where contributors are required to be women), you'll find work by male authors that, naturally, fulfills the same literary requirements as the women's pieces. I suggest, for example, looking for the "male" names in anthologies edited by Maxim Jakubowski, Alison Tyler, Rachel Kramer Bussel, and Kristina Wright; in the Coming Together series; and in the Clean Sheets archives.
DeleteI've seen it said that women readers are more interested in lust than in an actual sex act. That was back when "bodice busters" were the rising big deal, and I figured then that most women probably weren't getting as much of the lust part in bed as they wanted, in the form of foreplay. It could also be linked to the general assumption then that women's part in sex was to lure, attract, inflame, or whatever, men, and then to satisfy the needs they'd aroused. These days women--but certainly not all women--are claiming their right to lust for men, and and to demand their own orgasmic satisfaction, in fiction as well as fact. But fiction gives us a chance to dwell more, for longer, on the build-up of erotic tension, the arousal that's fed by being desired as well as desiring, and as an erotica editor I look for that even more than for the conclusive pyrotechnics. Bear in mind, though, that I'm writing and editing mainly (though not always) for women readers, and lesbian women at that, so what male readers want could be very different. I've heard about some male writers trying to organize a "movement" for erotica just the way they think men want it (and they want to write it,) but I haven't heard any more about it lately, for what that's worth.
ReplyDeleteAre you thinking of the Best Men's Erotica project? That was basically two editors (under the auspices of an indie publisher) who didn't think well of virtually anything already in print by the many well-regarded male authors in contemporary erotica, and had their own idea of what male readers wanted. I got into a long debate with them over what I perceived as gender stereotyping and other flawed premises in their mission statements. (But I don't know whatever happened to the project, either.)
DeleteI hate this kind of stereotyping. I've known plenty of men who really enjoyed the flirtation, the build-up, the simmering climb to a burn.
DeleteYeah, Jeremy, that's the one. In fact I may have heard about it from you. it's true, though, that there's no such thing as a Best Men's Erotica, as far as i know (and I'm sure they wouldn't wish to be associated with Best Gay Men's Erotica.) And I have to admit, to my shame, that erotica written specifically for men only makes me think of what appears in dramatically-illustrated men's mags. Not that some of that isn't good, at least probably--the only time I've looked into a copy of Penthouse was when I had a story in one, and that was just because they were plucking a few pieces from a fairly literary anthology by women to show men what women were writing. They gave me a very nice illustration, anyway, but trimmed my story to less than half its original length.
ReplyDeleteWell, by all accounts, Maxim Jakubowski has always been a man, and he chooses the stories in his Best New Erotica series without consulting anyone else (as far as I know), so the whole anthology represents one man's taste. I'm also not convinced that stereotyped notions of what males vs. females want are an observation rather than a cause of those differences. However, if an annual series of Best (Straight-Up Heterosexual) Men's Erotica gets off the ground, I wouldn't object. This seems to be the only target audience that isn't already featured in the title of an annual "best-of" erotic anthology.
ReplyDeleteLate to the party, but I love Renfield's Lament, Lisabet! It's got so much beautiful description.
ReplyDeleteI, too, like definitions of erotica that don't require orgasm. Lana Fox once talked to me about the importance of portraying yearning and desire, and I think about that all the time, even if I am writing a story that ends in satisfaction. In all fiction, characters have to want something, and they have to want it enough to make the reader care. I think one of the reasons anthologies can occasionally get repetitive is that sometimes the desire for orgasm is all that's there, and it doesn't seem strong or personal enough, especially when it's too easily fulfilled in story after story. The stories that knock me over always have more palpable and personal wanting.
To be honest, the desire for an orgasm seems pretty banal to me. I mean, sure, I like orgasms. However, during the most intense sexual encounters that I can remember, I wasn't thinking about orgasms at all.
DeleteAnd thank you for your compliment on the story. I wrote it partly as a challenge to myself, in response to a discussion, I think on the ERWA blog, about happy endings in erotica.
Delete