Maybe it’s the Catholic education that’s made me so skeptical.
Maybe if I were taught that everything had a logical explanation beyond ‘faith’
I would react with more imagination to unexplainable phenomena in the physical
world. After all, the nuns schooled me in the use of the English language. That
turned out okay. The math they taught me works adequately and conforms to demonstrable
rules. Cause and effect come into play.
But not so with articles of faith and resulting dogma that stem
from hiding one’s head in the sand. The religious approach didn’t seem capable of answering obvious
questions or considering the contradiction of a round earth (which they
acknowledged). Given that Heaven was up in the air, then hell must be below the
earth’s crust. In Europe until the end of the 15th century, the accepted truth
(except for those who sailed the seas) was that the world was flat, apparently
to support that belief.
One of the first things I remember being skeptical about as
an innocent seven year-old, wondering about what the nuns described as a
‘mystery’: the Catholic concept of the Trinity—three persons in one god. I
raised my hand and said that it was simple: Just as there was one senate, there
were quite a few senators. The teacher dismissed that as not valid for some
obscure reason. The concept of the Trinity was something that was ‘true’ but a
‘mystery’ and I’d damn well better learn to trust (in faith) that the concept
was a mystery and, as a mere mortal, impossible to comprehend. But I believed I’d
figured it out. At seven.
How disconcerting to a young man, when all the faith he can
muster is reversed by simple questions that won’t get answered due to contradictions
with dogma. If hell were below us, wouldn’t the earth be overflowing with
sinners by now? Millions of years of
human existence, with all the artifacts in evidence, yet we must believe the
earth was created in seven days? In 1960’s Catholic high school biology, our science
teacher spent one hour of our sophomore year on the “Theory of Evolution”— only taught to satisfy state requirements. We were told not to believe it. I transferred
to a public school the following year.
Of course Momma X and I have experienced occurrences that
can’t be explained. For example, the pair of large red plastic hoop earrings
that fell from …err… somewhere… after we’d just painted the kitchen of our
first apartment. They appeared on the drop cloth in front of four people, one
of whom said, “They’re falling!” as they dropped from above. There was no shade
on the ceiling fixture—we’d taken that down to paint. The apartment was totally
cleared out before we started. We’d worked there all day. None of those present
had seen the earrings before. We still exchange them with the woman who saw them
fall, sending them back and forth every few years to mark the event.
Then there was the apartment house back east, previously a
single-family home. Upon entering the
stairwell leading up to our flat you had to pass through the eerily cold foyer.
We and any visitors were fraught with apprehension until we got through our
door. Friends waiting for us to answer the buzzer often became quite rattled. During
an unrelated conversation with the landlord, he let slip that his mother had
passed away in that foyer.
So why does this happen? Why do we anticipate a certain caller
before the phone rings? If a loved one dies miles away, why do we wake at the
exact moment of death? Do we have a telepathic line to one another? Certainly,
people who live and love together over years experience communication that
can’t be explained. My point is not necessarily that there is an otherworldly
force or spiritual entity among us. Or, that human beings will never understand
phenomena that may eventually become obvious within the corpus of provable physics.
Let me explain:
Imagine a two-dimensional world, consisting only of length
and width. A being on that world would experience height differently than we
would. Consider a three dimensional object on that flat surface. The
two-dimensional being traveling on that surface would experience the object as
an unexplained barrier. The idea of height wouldn’t come into play. Though
height would exist in the greater physical
world, the being wouldn’t be privy to its existence. Possibly only a sense of
shadow or repeated encounters would effect a subtle, unexplainable hint. The
significance of the shadow would be lost to the being, much like our perception
of time.
We are three-dimensional creatures, bound by the limitations
of a three-dimensional world. We have inherent knowledge of length, width and
height. Rules that govern these dimensions are pretty darned predictable, yet
we do have the hint of a fourth dimension—the unpredictable time. We experience
time as a sense of its passing, but do not fully comprehend or see where time
goes or what’s to come. At present, the thinking is that time is just another
straight line, like length, width or height.
Perhaps a slip along that elusive dimensional line could
account for our premonitions, our intuition and connections beyond our blind
spots. Food for thought.
I will leave it to you to ponder this further. But I do
believe that there will come a day (If Trump doesn’t totally truncate earth’s
time) where we may understand these phenomena for what they actually are. Even
if humans can never experience an innate four-dimensional reality, perhaps in
the future there may be physical, non-contradictory, theoretically provable
explanations for things we now consider out of this world.
Or maybe there’s a big old guy in a white beard up there,
pointing down and pulling strings. If so, he’s a trickster MF.
Why stop at four?
ReplyDeleteI don't envy your education. However both you and Bob Buckley turned out really well (you're both fabulous writers for one thing), so maybe the sisters had more on the ball than you thought!
Well, I don't know about the fifth and other dimensions. Not sure we get as solid a hint on the others. But time we get a sense of, and it could explain a lot of what we're talking about.
DeleteYes, Bob and I have discussed this, though he's twice the writer I am. I hit the button every now and then. Bob nails it every time. He's a journalist who uses his considerable skills every day. I never went to college. The old girls sure did well by us in English. And, my knuckles have healed nicely.
Perhaps there is a dimension where miserable old nuns are writhing in agony. Oh, that is an uncharitable thought, isn't it?
ReplyDeleteEven as a child I wondered what would make a person devote their life to something as elusive as God. Could be that by a certain age, they realized what they'd missed then took it out on young men. I certainly don't remember many girls getting beat up. Maybe girls didn't challenge them as we did.
DeleteOh, there's an idea for a paranormal flasher! The nuns are writhing because they're "forced" to observe indecent acts.
DeleteI like how you got into the fourth dimension at the end there. I love Flatland every time I read it (though the sexism always throws me). Your metaphor here is very similar to the way Flatland suggests one should think about the unexplained.
ReplyDeleteWhat fascinates me is that we can mathematically look well beyond four dimensions. It's just increasingly hard to visualize what it is we're seeing.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteInsight into the 5th dimension and beyond would be even more alien than manipulation of the 4th. Not the hints we can relate to.
DeleteNow I come to think of it, quantum physics seems uncanny to me, especially the part about probabilities. I probably have it wrong, but I think I've heard/read that any given particle could go anywhere, so that where you observe it is likely to be the place with the highest probability, but it's not impossible that it could go elsewhere. Maybe those red earrings had just picked a low-probability place to appear.
ReplyDeleteI would expect there are locational (or temporal) portals that would be more or less prone to slippage. Like up against a three-dimensional object in a 2-dimensional world.
DeleteI've seen this theory somewhere before, and it makes sense. What looks to us like uncanny "deja vu" might just be a sign that time isn't linear. I'm reminded of a weird episode of "The Simpsons" (normally represented by cartoon characters) when Homer falls through a portal into a world of puppets (or so they appear).
ReplyDeleteBut that wouldn't necessarily require a non-linear time. Perhaps in the right circumstances, an entity could pop in anywhere along a theoretical line.
DeleteIf you haven't already, you need to watch Arrival. It tantalizes with the same kind of thinking you're doing here, in a very visual way. You think about it long after the movie is done. Thst's my kind of Sci-fi!
ReplyDelete